Translation And Its Role In India English Language Essay

deracination And Its Role In India side of meat Language EssayQuestions such as, what is translationwherein lies its complexity? have been asked ever since books stopped being restricted to one target readership and moved beyond the boundaries of language. The term translation technically con nones the art of recomposing a work in another(prenominal) language with discover losing its original flavour, or of finding an analogous substitute.Its complexity lies in it being wish the transfer of perfume from one bottle to another. As alert as you be, some fragrance is lost but the challenge remains to capture the essence.All things in nature be subject to change and so is all heathenish matter. Translation is al slipway a shift, not mingled with two languages but between the two types of cultural matter.India is a linguistic wandflower of unparalleled richness. Few contexts could be better suited than the Indian for a discussion of the processes of translation within a spectac ular stellar setting. How does one mutual idea of India make itself avail up to(p) to a Bengali, Tamil or a Marathi in any way save that of translation? Translation provides a cognitive map of Indias linguistic world in all its interrelatedness as well as estrangement. All texts and all readers are both monolingual and multilingual. A text, obviously written literally in one language in a given manifestation faces a multi lingual reader and thus reaches out to a practically larger base, unifying experiences and opinions as it expands.English has to be admitted as a vast reservoir of translation in contemporary India. It whitethorn no longer be a colonial language, but it is increasingly a conduit language. This filter language, as Khubchandani terms it, has today a certain ineluctable presence. More English translating have been published in India in recent times than ever before, but our awareness of the pauperization to ensure quality in translation has not heightened the same extent. Who should judge a translation somebody who stinker read the original or somebody who cannot? A person who was able to read the language, and enjoyed the original may find no translation satisfactory, whereas someone who cannot is likely to regard readability in English is the prime requisite.It seems unarguable that the exclusively way in which the ideology of unity can be explored in a multilingual society like ours is by accepting both the need for, and the problems of, translation.The Sanskritised term we currently use for translation in many Indian languages isanuvada which literally means after speech so it seems wrong in the start-off place to discuss it in an Introduction. It also stands in contrast toanukaran, which implies aping or slavish imitation, but there ought to be a more to the word than yet the redeion that it could involve creative license of a kind?Any discussion of translation leads automatically to the question who is an ideal translator? The wr iter himself, or someone who has not been involved in the primary creative art? The task of the translator is to unfreeze the shapes that thought took in one language and refreeze them into another. A translator must take into account rules that are not strictly linguistic but cultural. Translators, even when trying to give us the flavor of the language, are in fact modernizing the source. As far as translators in India are concerned, most Indians who grow up in urban conditions and go to school and college face up shifts from one language to another so often and so comfortably that translation seems second nature to them.TRANSLATION STUDIESThe Pedagogy of Translationby Vanamala ViswanathaTranslation Studies is a young discipline still in the process of mapping its territory. Attempts have been made to define its boundaries and develop its terrain by scholars working in disciplines as varied as Anthropology, Comparative Literature, Culture Studies, Linguistics and Literary Theory.V iewing translation as a transaction between two languages, the dominant linguistic paradigm has treated it merely as a matter of transfer from the beginning Language to the invest Language.There can be two ways of translating Transliteration and Transcreation.Transliteration or literal translation is word-to-word, phrase-to-phrase or sentence-to-sentence carrying over from the Source Text into the Target Text. This means that the wrangling and terminologies would either require exact equivalents in the Target Language or would have to be put as it is into the Target Text. It may be ideal for texts falling under technical registers. But they would conjure up extremely difficult when done on cultural texts. The aim of the translation is to reproduce meanings of the Source Text and the immediate effect it produces on the native listening for the readers and audience of another culture in whose language the text is to be translated. But, say, all(prenominal) Hindi word cannot have a counterpart in English because of its vast language and cultural differences in certain connotations and structures. Hence, the literal translation of cultural/literary whole works would be like forsaking the duty of a translator.On the other hand, transcreation or cultural translation means a partial or complete freedom to the translator in dealing with the Source Text. The translator has to render the Source Text in a recreated form in the Target Language. It involves reading e actually word and sentence carefully, but it is not only or simply a literal rendering.Another step in translation is termed as Transfer. It is the stage in which the analysed material is transferred in the soul of the translator from the Source Text to the Target Text. The final stage is restructuring the transferred material. The basic structural elements have to be transferred to the Target Language. It has to be ensured in the process of fracture that the same effect the Source Text had should be achieved for the Target Text for its readers. When the translation produces the same effect as on the original audience thus the translation can be considered equivalent to the Source Text.PROBLEMS OF TRANSLATIONThe translator has to deal with the problem of finding equivalent words and expressions in the Target Language, which though cannot be substitutes for the expressions in the Source Language, but can come close to it, can raise similar feelings and attitudes in the readers and audiences of the Target Text.Literary and cultural texts suggest rather than describe meanings. Cultural meanings are very specific and their connotations vary with words in other languages. Therefore, it is really difficult to expect equivalence between the texts of two languages separated by two unlike cultures. The translator has to interpret and analyse the connotative and suggestive of the Source Text and on the basis of his noesis of the culture of the Target Text he has to recreate the meanings in the new language.Figures of speech, extended metaphors, idioms, proverbs and allegories pose a great challenge to the translator. Even translating dialogues, forms of dressing, different kinds of pabulum can be difficult when it has strong cultural roots. For example, words like saree, churidar, pan, pallucannot have an English counterpart. In India, there is a specific word for every familial relationship. For instance,chacha, mama, phupha, taujiare all called uncle in English, similarly nana-nanianddada-dadi are simply grandparents. Also, the suggested meanings of these relationships can never be translated into any other language.To show how the differences in cultural facts can cause difficulties in the translation of metaphors we may look at the symbolic meanings of certain words in different cultures. Owl in English is the symbol of wisdom whereas it symbolizes ill-fortune in Persian and is associated to superstitious beliefs in India. Also, pig, hog and swine are differ ent words for the same animal but these small variations can create big differences in metaphorical meaningsSam is a pig.Sam is a hog.Sam is a swine.The languages which do not have separate words for these different categories would fail to represent the difference between the discoursal value of the above metaphors. Thus, a literal translation may lead to Target Language metaphors with different and sometimes completely opposite discoursal values.TRANSLATED WRITERSWe are now going to talk about a few writers who have brought out very vividly the different cultures of India through their writing in vernacular languages. The languages we are going to focus upon are Hindi, Urdu, Marathi, Bengali, Assamese, Tamil and Kannada. It is the voice of this marginalized section writing in vernacular languages, curiously of the women regional writers, which needs to be heard. This is possible only through translation, which gives them recognition all over the world.RABINDRANATH TAGORETagore wa s the first Indian Nobel Laureate. He won the Nobel Prize in 1930 for his translation of theGitanjali.His best cognize works areGoraandGhare Baire. His works verse, short stories and novels are acclaimed for their lyricism, colloquialism, naturalism and contemplation. Of Tagores prose, his short stories are perhaps most highly regarded indeed he is credited with originating the Bengali language version of the genre. His short stories mostly borrow from the deceptively simple subject matter common people. The translation of his works into various languages has given people across cultures a glimpse of the world of the Bengali common man.Given below is Robi Duttas translation of his poem UrvashiNo overprotect thou, no daughter thouThou art no bride,O maiden fair and freeO inhabitant of NandanUrvasiGULZARSampooran Singh Kalrabetter known as Gulzar is anIndianpoet,lyricistanddirector.Gulzarprimarily works inHindi-Urduand also works in Punjabi, several dialects of Hindi likebraj bha sha,khadi boli,Haryanviand Marwari.Gulzar has received many awards including the Padma Bhushan and the academy Awardfor his song Jai Ho.He has been widely translated into English and other languages. During the Jaipur Literary Festival, Pawan Varma, an eminent IFS officer who has translated Gulzars poetry, said that he faced a difficulty translating phrases like tip tip and tap tap and Gulzar replied abhi to humne kabutar ki gutar goon shuru bhi nahi ki hai.Sunjoy Shekhar, who has also translated Gulzar calls himself a smuggler trying to surreptitiously smuggle the feelings evoked by Gulzars lyrics across an impermissible, alien wordscape. To give a flavor of the translation of his poetry, given below is a song of his along with its translationbasa cand kraoD,aoM saalaaoM maoMsaUrja kI Aaga bauJaogaI jabaAaOr rak, D,ogaI saUrja saojaba kao- caaMd na DUbaogaaAaOr kao- ja,maIM na BarogaItba zMDa bauJaa k kaoyalaa saaTukD,a yao ja,maIM ka GaUmaogaaBaTka BaTkamawma KiksaI raoSanaI maoMm aOM saaocata hUM sa emailprotectedAga,r kaga,ja, po ilaKI hu- naj,makhIM D,to D,to saUrja maoM igarotao saUrja ifr saoo jalanao lagaoIn a billion years whenThe suns fire dwindlesAnd ash blows across its surfaceThen the moon will no longer waneAnd the land not riseWhen like a cold, burnt out piece of coalThis earth revolvesLost in its scrollTrailing a dying, sepia glowI think thenIf a poem written on a piece of paper was to drift alongAnd perchance land on the sunThe sun would ignite again.AMBAIC. S. Lakshmi was born inCoimbatore,Tamil Naduin 1944. Some of her works A color SeaandIn A Forest, A Deer(2006) have been translated English byLakshmi Holmstrm. In 2006, she (along with Lakshmi Holmstrm) won the Vodafone-Crossword prize. For her contributions to Tamil literature, she received the 2008Iyal Virudhu. Her work is characterized by her feminism, an oculus for detail, and a sense of irony. Exploration of space, silence, coming to terms with ones body or sexuality, and the impor tance of communication are some of the recurring themes in her works.VIJAYDAN DETHAVijaydan Dethaalso known asBijjiis a noted writer fromRajasthanand a recipient ofPadma Shriaward(2007). He has also received several other awards such asSahitya Akademi AwardandSahitya Chudamani Award.He has more than 800 short stories to his credit, which are translated into English and other languages. He is co-founder ofRupayan Sansthanwith lateKomal Kothari, an institute that documents Rajasthani folk-lore, arts and music. His literary works include Bataan ri Phulwari (garden of tales), a fourteen loudness collection of stories that draws on folk-lore and spoken dialects of Rajasthan. His stories and novels have been adapted for many plays and movies includingHabib TanvirsCharandas ChorandAmol PalekarsPaheli.He once said If you do not want to be a comely writer, you should return to your village and write in Rajasthani.5.SALMABorn in 1968 in Tamil Nadu,Salmas first poetry collection shocked cons ervative society where women are supposed to remain silent. In 2003, Salma along with three other Tamil women poets faced obscenity charges and violent threats. Salma is now head of the panchayat (local level governance body) of Thuvarankurichi, near Trichi in Tamil Nadu. The government of Tamil Nadu has appointed her Chairperson of the Tamil Nadu Social Welfare Board.Her novel, translated as Midnight Talesfocuses on the inner world of Muslim women in the conservative society of Tamil Nadu in south India. It gives us an insight into what actually goes on in the households of this section of the society and brings it out very effectively. The novel was also long-listed for the Man Asian Prize of 2007.Translating these texts into more widely spoken languages like Hindi and English has taken their voice to a much wider range of readers.